Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!shadooby!sharkey!atanasoff!jwright From: jwright@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu (Jim Wright) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Advantages of keeping binaries out of S: Message-ID: <1940@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu> Date: 14 Nov 89 11:49:43 GMT References: <3770@nigel.udel.EDU> <0ZKoagy00UkaFnd_R7@andrew.cmu.edu> <2157@leah.Albany.Edu> Reply-To: jwright@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu (Jim Wright) Organization: Iowa State U. Computer Science Department, Ames, IA Lines: 20 bader+@andrew.cmu.edu (Miles Bader) writes: | wfh58@leah.Albany.Edu (William F. Hammond) writes: | > I think "lib:" is already spoken for. But I don't like that approach. | You're thinking of "libs:" Unless you have a compiler which wants a lib: directory. Yes it's spoken for. | > "devs:printers", "devs:keymaps" are things we already have and "devs:sounds" This sounds like the best idea so far. | Notice that the printer drivers and keymaps are both files used for | interfacing with particular devices... Random sounds are not... Why call a hardcopy system and an input system "devices", and exclude an audio system? -- Jim Wright jwright@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu