Path: utzoo!censor!geac!jtsv16!uunet!philmtl!philabs!frank!jaa
From: jaa@frank.Philips.Com (Joseph M. Amato)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: Poor performance of SR10.1 on 590's
Message-ID: <67798@philabs.Philips.Com>
Date: 10 Nov 89 15:00:57 GMT
References: <8911100136.AA05332@humu.nosc.mil>
Reply-To: jaa@frank.UUCP (Joseph M. Amato)
Organization: Philips Laboratories, Briarcliff Manor, NY
Lines: 26

In article <8911100136.AA05332@humu.nosc.mil> kent@HUMU.NOSC.MIL (Kent K. Kuriyama) writes:
>We have recently installed 10.1 (AEGIS and BSD) on a DN590-T that 
>was previously running 9.7.  The system has 8MB of RAM and a 348 
>MB drive.  The system's response to simple commands like 'ls' and 
>'cd' is exasperatingly slow at times.  Apollo says they are aware 
>of the problem but don't have a solution yet.  The problem seems 
>to be confined to DN570-590 series machines as our DN3500 has no 
>problems with 10.1.
>
>
>Anybody else experience this same problem?

And how.  570-T running very slow.
Apollo or Mentor Graphics (I can't remember which) claims the 570-T
machine is as fast if not faster than a 3000.

		DON'T YOU BELIEVE IT.

Our 3000 has always been faster. (both run with 8Mb)

Joe Amato

 jaa@philabs.philips.com  |  Some say "life is not worth living."
                          |      ...many have a wish to die.
    My company's views    |  I wonder, 
        may differ        |      will they then say "death is not worth dying?"