Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!NISC.SRI.COM!cwilson From: cwilson@NISC.SRI.COM (Chan Wilson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: RE: re: comp.sys.apple2.tech Message-ID: <9803@fs2.NISC.SRI.COM> Date: 12 Nov 89 13:46:02 GMT References: <13396.apple.net@pro-sol> Reply-To: cwilson@ws21.UUCP (Chan Wilson) Organization: Network Info Systems Ctr., SRI Intl., Menlo Park, CA. Lines: 39 In article <13396.apple.net@pro-sol> lbotez@pro-sol.cts.com (Lynda Botez) writes: >In-Reply-To: message from UNESTJ%UNCVX1.BITNET@vtvm1.cc.vt.edu > >I personally think the apple2.tech forum is a cop-out for the people from >Apple who don't want to hear any kind of criticism from the established user >base. > >However, if the posts keep multiplying like they seem to be doing these days, >I suppose it could be useful to separate the stuff. > >Lynda Argh. Look, take a gander at what has happened over in comp.sys.mac. They have split off comp.sys.mac into *four* other groups, mac.digest, mac.hypercard mac.programmer, and most recently, mac.hardware. These splits took place because there was too much traffic for the people to sift through. I've seen the number of articles on comp.sys.apple skyrocket in the past couple months; it *is* getting harder to sift through all the other articles, whether they be "I can't get KERMIT to work," or bitching and moaning about Apple Co. non-activity. There is a precedent for this; so what's the problem? Sure, the traffic may not be great, but that's far better than sifting through 100+ articles to find the answer to your question, eh? --Chan Wilson ................ Computer Operator, SRI International Genius has limits, stupidity is boundless, just look around you. I've grown weary of imbeciles on the net. cwilson@nisc.sri.com or cwilson@nic.ddn.mil ................ -- --Chan Wilson `and now for something completely different.' Flamingo coloured penguins and banana coloured grapes. cwilson@nisc.sri.com or cwilson@nic.ddn.mil