Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!Teknowledge.COM!polya!shelby!lindy!ucscb.UCSC.EDU!unknown
From: unknown@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Unknown User)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: 100 Meg Vulcan  (Was: Re: 10 mhz chips)
Keywords: 100 Meg Vulcan, CHANGE THE SUBJECT WHEN APPROPRIATE
Message-ID: <5838@lindy.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 17 Nov 89 03:24:52 GMT
References: <2757.cortland.info-apple@pro-houston>
Sender: news@lindy.Stanford.EDU (News Service)
Reply-To: unknown@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Unknown User)
Organization: UCSC Undergrads
Lines: 15



In article <2757.cortland.info-apple@pro-houston> jabernathy@pro-houston.cts.com (Joe Abernathy) writes:
>... Now that you mention it, I've got a two-month-old, 100 MB, $1,800 Vulcan
>that suddenly has started sounding worse than my two-year-old CMS 60 that's
>run continuously for all the time I've had it. 

	Might I ask you why you spent $1800 on a 100 meg Vulcan hard drive
when you could have EASILY gotten a 100 meg (or larger) SCSI drive for 
$800 not including the SCSI card price itself? Sure, having an internal
drive is nice, but COME ON! More than twice the price for the same, if not
less, storage? I'm honestly not trying to sound rude in the above, but you
could have easily saved yourself a lot of your hard earned money.

unknown@ucscb.ucsc.edu