Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!milton!max!scott
From: scott@max.u.washington.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Subject: Re: C-Power compiler
Message-ID: <10399@max.u.washington.edu>
Date: 15 Nov 89 05:41:03 GMT
References: <10345@max.u.washington.edu> <73954@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle WA
Lines: 20

In article <73954@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>, dyson@flamingo.cis.ohio-state.edu (mark l dyson) writes:
> If by 'C-Power' you meant 'Power C,' then it's a commercial title.  It's
> in the 'Better Working' series released by Spinnaker.  I own a copy, and
> am very happy with it, even though it doesn't fully support the new ANSI
> standard.  I seem to recall only paying about $20.00 for it.  Spinnaker is
> exemplary in publishing software at realistic prices as a hedge against
> piracy, instead of glitzy copy-protections schemes (which don't work) and
> attendant higher prices.  Buy it, and the 'Power Assembler' in the same
> series, and give this outstanding company it's well-deserved business.
>
> Peace
> -Mark-
 
How about the "Super C" compiler? Does anyone have any experience with this
C compiler? How good of a compiler is it and how well is its documentation?
Does it fully support the ANSI standard better than "Power C"?
 
Any comments will be appreciated,
 
Scott.