Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!nprdc!halff
From: halff@nprdc.arpa (Henry Halff)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Question about Reflex 2.0
Summary: Allows for 32 meg, 64 meg files
Message-ID: <4526@arctic.nprdc.arpa>
Date: 10 Nov 89 13:17:07 GMT
References: <1989Nov9.121738.7654@aucs.uucp>
Sender: news@nprdc.arpa
Reply-To: halff@nprdc.arpa (Henry Halff)
Distribution: na
Organization: Halff Resources, Inc.
Lines: 16

In article <1989Nov9.121738.7654@aucs.uucp> peter@aucs.uucp (Peter Steele) writes:
>...in Reflex 1.0 ... the
>number of fields in a record, and I believe the number of records,
>is restricted by the amount of memory (640K). The manual states
>that you can have approximately 600-800 records in a database
>if the records have around 70 fields. This is too restrictive
>for his needs. What improvements are there in Reflex 2.0 in
>regards to restrictions like these?

From the Reflex 2.0 "Getting Started" manual--

"Bigger Files.  Database files are no longer limited by the amount of
available system memory (RAM) and can be as large as 32 megabytes,
with as many as 65,000 records."

hh