Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:38137 alt.msdos.programmer:688
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!cpsc6a!atl2!akgua!occrsh!uokmax!unmvax!aplcen!samsung!think!mintaka!oliveb!mipos3!omepd!littlei!ogccse!ucsd!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!dvinci!lowey
From: lowey@dvinci.usask.ca (Kevin Lowey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,alt.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: The "Best" PC editor
Message-ID: <1989Oct20.230616.26715@dvinci.usask.ca>
Date: 20 Oct 89 23:06:16 GMT
References: <1989Oct17.201657.4450@ctr.columbia.edu>
Organization: University of Saskatchewan
Lines: 10

> I need to convince some people that Epsilon is a better editor for
> programming in C than the IBM Professional Editor, or SPF/PC (an IBM
> mainframe editor lookalike).

My reply is why bother?  Personally I use the free MicroEMACS 3.10 editor.
I know that if someone came along and told me I had to use a different
editor, I'd tell them where to go real quick.  Why not just let the
programmer decide what he/she wants to use.

-- Kevin Lowey