Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!udel!eplrx7!leipold
From: leipold@eplrx7.uucp (Walt Leipold)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Need a review of THINK C 4.0
Message-ID: <1989Nov14.142419.11795@eplrx7.uucp>
Date: 14 Nov 89 14:24:19 GMT
References: <1346@mrsvr.UUCP> <296@dbase.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@udel.EDU
Reply-To: leipold@eplrx7.UUCP (Walt Leipold)
Distribution: na
Organization: E.I.DuPont de Nemours & Co.
Lines: 14

In article <296@dbase.UUCP> awd@dbase.UUCP (Alastair Dallas) writes:
>Then it's a choice between MacApp,
>which is >$500 if you don't already have MPW, some offbeat development
>system (Neon?), or Think C 4.0.  

Yes, Neon is offbeat, but it generates fast, tight code.  And for those
who haven't got heavy iron, it runs just fine (even faster than Think C)
on a Mac Plus.
-- 
"As long as you've lit one candle,                         Walt Leipold
you're allowed to curse the darkness."       (leipolw%esvax@dupont.com)
--
--
The UUCP Mailer