Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request From: ethz!wyle@relay.eu.net (Mitchell Wyle) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: Setting up a Sparcstation lab. Keywords: Miscellaneous Message-ID: <2958@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 13 Nov 89 07:28:59 GMT Sender: root@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 32 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu X-Refs: Original: v8n166, Replies: v8n172 v8n192, Related: v8n192 X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 194, message 4 of 23 In article <2910@brazos.Rice.edu> greg@duke.cs.unlv.edu (Greg Wohletz) writes: >X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 192, message 2 of 14 >|We are considering setting up a small lab of SUN Sparcstations and were >|wondering if anyone else had had experiences (good or bad) with a similar >|setup. Here is what we are considering: >| 1.) ~10 Sparcstations, each with 8M of memory and a single 104M local disk >| for paging and temp space. >| 2.) An additional Sparcstation with ~2G of SCSI disk space to act as a >| file server for 1.). Unless you plan to stay at a 4.0.x release of SunOS, Sunview, and have fewer than 3 windows open, you should *definitely* get more than 8 Mb per ss-1. You mentioned nothing about the applications you want to run. Lots of large compiles? Oracle? Get more memory. Wait til January to get your memory, though. There is a production line in Japan about to open which will double the world's current 1Mb simms output. >We have 25 sparactations here, each has 8 meg and a load 104M disk. Our >experiance has been that 8M of memory is not sufficient. With about 3 >windows open, and a C compile going the machine will page heavily. We are >planning on uping most of ours to at least 12Meg. It seems to me that 12 is a bad compromise. Either you limp along with 8 or you go whole-hog for 16. The German Sun Users' group electronic mailing list had a discussion about xview News/X and memory; 12M wasn't quite enough. The consensus was that future SunOS releases are going to want 16M in a compiling environment and at least 12 MIPS. It sort of reminds me of the IBM Mega-line-of-code operating systems which eat 1 MIPS to figure out what to do with one key stroke...