Path: utzoo!yunexus!ists!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!uunet!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386 Subject: Re: ESIX joys!! (?!) Keywords: ESIX, Unix Message-ID: <7011@ficc.uu.net> Date: 16 Nov 89 18:19:44 GMT Article-I.D.: ficc.7011 References: <1024@unsvax.NEVADA.EDU> <6081@shlump.nac.dec.com> <6700039@adaptex> <1989Nov15.212321.3012@arnor.uucp> Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 16 > > a very nice port of UNIX. > Well, have you ever seen an "ugly" port? Lots of them. > The Color [X] is ABSOLUTELY unusable (slow). I haven't seen a color X that wasn't unusable by my standards. When a 33 MHz 80386 is less responsive than a 7 MHz 68000, there's something wrong, even if you *can* get work done. -- `-_-' Peter da Silva . 'U` -------------- +1 713 274 5180. "vi is bad because it didn't work after I put jelly in my keyboard." -- Jeffrey W Percival (jwp@larry.sal.wisc.edu)