Path: utzoo!yunexus!ists!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Why isn't argv[argc]==(char *)0 ?
Message-ID: <11634@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 17 Nov 89 18:58:35 GMT
Article-I.D.: smoke.11634
References: <547.nlhp3@oracle.nl> <MEISSNER.89Nov17094904@tiktok.rtp.dg.com>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 6

In article <MEISSNER.89Nov17094904@tiktok.rtp.dg.com> meissner@dg-rtp.dg.com (Michael Meissner) writes:
>Note, this effectively rules out a ANSI C implementation on a Version
>6 system (V6 for whatever reason, put -1 in argv[argc], ...

Actually that can easily be fixed by the start-up module.
I did that once, long ago.