Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!HUB.UCSB.EDU!bfox%vision From: bfox%vision@HUB.UCSB.EDU (Brian Fox) Newsgroups: gnu.bash.bug Subject: slight readline modification Message-ID: <8911151711.AA18794@hub.ucsb.edu> Date: 15 Nov 89 17:10:16 GMT References: Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Reply-To: bfox%cornu@hub.ucsb.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 33 Posted-Date: 15 Nov 89 12:26:19 GMT Date: 15 Nov 89 12:26:19 GMT From: garfield!stretch!jeff1@uunet.uu.net (Jeff Sparkes) Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland References: <1989Nov14.063818.17288@fxgrp.fx.com> Sender: bug-bash-request@prep.ai.mit.edu >>>>> On 14 Nov 89 06:38:18 GMT, grady@fxgrp.fx.com (Steven Grady) said: grady> First thing I want to say is that I'm way impressed with the grady> input editing features of bash (ie the readline library). I'm grady> very appreciative of the work that went into making a good vi grady> mode, especially. And it even has multiple undo! Now, on to grady> the suggestions... Actually, multiple undos are a sort of side effect. Both multiple and vi style will be in my next bunch. I've even added undoable undos. You are VI fixated. He is complementing the fact that Readline has multiple undos. For those who don't know, Jeff wrote the bulk of the vi mode. grady> I currently use tcsh, and one thing it does that bash's grady> readline doesn't is put the cursor at the _end_ of the line grady> when you start moving through the history (in either vi or grady> emacs mode). Having the cursor at the end is slightly better This is simply false. The cursor moves to the end of the line in emacs mode. Perhaps it doesn't do this in vi-mode? Brian