Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cheops.cis.ohio-state.edu!karl
From: karl@cheops.cis.ohio-state.edu (Karl Kleinpaste)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: More duplicates from 19 October
Message-ID: <KARL.89Nov13101355@cheops.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 13 Nov 89 15:13:55 GMT
References: <1989Nov12.221000.13228@rpi.edu>
	<AMBAR.89Nov12190742@portnoy.mit.edu>
Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Organization: Ohio State Computer Science
Lines: 10

ambar@bloom-beacon.mit.edu writes:
   ... I'm seriously
   considering jacking up the 'retain' time for history lines to 8 weeks
   (56 days), at least on the systems I run that have disk space enough for
   such foolishness.  Any comments?

My paranoia about such stuff is unbounded above; I use 70-day
retention.  I don't get hit with old dups.

--Karl