Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!gryphon!richard
From: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Results of sci.aquaria vote
Keywords: Yes 466, No 318, Maybe 1
Message-ID: <22101@gryphon.COM>
Date: 11 Nov 89 23:19:27 GMT
Reply-To: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 38

In article <834@philmtl.philips.ca> ray@philmtl.philips.ca (Ray Dunn) writes:
>In article <830@philmtl.philips.ca> I wrote:
>>Me, thrice, revoting because of flippant "acknowledgements" from Sexton
>>which could have been construed as rejections.
>
>In article <22007@gryphon.COM> richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton) replies:
>>Flippant ?
>>...
>> Perhaps you can tell me.
>
>Certainly.  Let's have an example shall we?
>
>I wrote (on a second attempt after a try through cadovax appeared to bounce):
>
>>I vote NO to sci.aquaria.
>>Please confirm receipt.
>
>I received the response:
>
>>Message-Id: <8910231337.AA02193@gryphon.COM>
>>Ok., you send me a receipt and I'l confirm it.
>
>Flippant?  I suppose you have difficulty recognizing it, it's not quite as
>obvious as derision and disdain.

Here, take two of these and call me in the morning:

		  :-) :-)



(I thought it was obvious that any correspondence counted as an
acknowledgement.)

-- 
This article was made from the finest quality words and sentances. Minor
imperfections in syntax, like the grain in fine leather, serve to enhance
it's beauty.    richard@gryphon.COM     {routing site}!gryphon!richard