Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!bbn!bbn.com!mesard From: mesard@bbn.com (Wayne Mesard) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Call For Discussion ; Rec.Kids Message-ID: <48097@bbn.COM> Date: 12 Nov 89 06:45:44 GMT References: <1989Nov8.023420.12396@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <10112@ucsd.Edu> <1989Nov10.013424.17574@ddsw1.MCS.COM> Sender: news@bbn.COM Reply-To: mesard@BBN.COM (Wayne Mesard) Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA Lines: 18 rang@cs.wisc.edu (Anton Rang) writes: >In article <1989Nov10.013424.17574@ddsw1.MCS.COM> benfeen@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Ben Feen) writes: >>Yes, I agree that rec.kids is a little silly - soc.kids is better. > > Or perhaps talk.kids...for kids talking with each other. Get it right. soc.foo is for foo's to talk with each other. talk.foo is for people to talk _About_ foo's. [And what a messy places t.p.g or t.a would be if it were otherwise.] Soc is the right place. Now is it a good idea? -- unsigned *Wayne_Mesard(); "This is a show for people with great haircuts Mesard@BBN.COM and short attention spans." BBN, Cambridge, MA - from the Nakamichi(?) International Music Series