Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sco!davidbe
From: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call For Discussion:  Comp.graphics.images
Message-ID: <354@scorn.sco.COM>
Date: 13 Nov 89 21:58:25 GMT
References: <30763@mips.mips.COM> <23724@cup.portal.com> <1989Nov7.192641.2556@sj.ate.slb.com> <1989Nov8.183232.11335@cs.uoregon.edu>
Sender: news@sco.COM
Reply-To: davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat)
Distribution: na
Organization: The Suction Caliper Osteopath
Lines: 25


news.groups's own koblas@tillamook.cs.uoregon.edu (David Koblas) said:
-
-Thus by including in the inital charter of a limit of 2Mb a 
-month comp.graphics.images will just be in the top 20 newsgroups
-for volume (this is roughly 64Kb a day of data).

Good!  We have another person who's volunteering to moderate the 
newsgroup.  You're not going to keep volume down in any other way.

AND...

For those of you who are getting tired of me making this "so you're going
to moderate" point, let me point this out:  Before a vote can be held
on whether to create a moderated newsgroup, you need a moderator.  I'm
perfectly willing to let a moderated images group go by; I will vote no
on an unmoderated one.   I'm probably not the only one who feels this way.

So find yourself a moderator, and we can end this discussion, and get to
a vote.

-- 
        David Bedno aka davidbe@sco.COM: Speaking from but not for SCO.

		   The keyboard's been drinking, not me.