Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!uokmax!ptgarvin
From: ptgarvin@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (Patrick T. Garvin)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Discussion: talk.religion.pagan
Keywords: to pagan or not to pagan
Message-ID: <1989Nov14.000023.1591@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu>
Date: 14 Nov 89 00:00:23 GMT
References: <127627@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <20704@ut-emx.UUCP> <1989Nov10.064622.29499@agate.berkeley.edu> <344@scorn.sco.COM>
Reply-To: ptgarvin@uokmax.UUCP (Patrick T. Garvin)
Organization: Discordian Information Production and Distribution, Ltd
Lines: 25

In article <344@scorn.sco.COM> davidbe@sco.COM (The Cat in the Hat) writes:
>
>The approximate meaning of the word pagan is something just about everyone
>seems to agree on.  Most people seem aware that Druidic rituals would fall
>belong in t.r.pagan, while discussions of the healing properties of crystals
>would be valid in t.r.newage.
>
>						close enough for Usenet

While we've not had the amount of discussion that the proposal for sci.aquaria
caused, it looks like, after the results of the name poll come in, that a call
for votes would not be inappropriate.


>-- 
>        David Bedno aka davidbe@sco.COM: Speaking from but not for SCO.
>
>		   The keyboard's been drinking, not me.


-- 
"If you juggle with knives, you're likely to get cut." -- Kieran Donegal
ptgarvin@aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu / ptgarvin@uokmax.UUCP | Hail Eris!
in the Society: Padraig Cosfhota o Ulad / Barony of Namron, Ansteorra
Disclaimer:  Fragile.  Contents inflammable.  Do not use near open flame.