Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!usenet
From: gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Discussion: talk.religion.pagan
Keywords: to pagan or not to pagan
Message-ID: <1989Nov14.080507.14221@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 14 Nov 89 08:05:07 GMT
References: <127627@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <20704@ut-emx.UUCP> <1989Nov10.064622.29499@agate.berkeley.edu> <1600@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Reply-To: gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith)
Organization: Garnet Gang Gems of Wisdom, Inc.
Lines: 17
In-reply-to: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr)

In article <1600@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>, davidsen@crdos1 (Wm E Davidsen Jr) writes:
>In article <1989Nov10.064622.29499@agate.berkeley.edu>,
gsmith@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith) writes:

>| This whole proposal is idiotic anyway, since talk.religion.newage
>| already exists.

I believe the difference between newage and pagan has been
explained several times.


  And each time it came out different. Since people don't even
agree as to what "pagan" means, it would not be a good name for
any group, anyway.
--
ucbvax!garnet!gsmith    Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
    "*That* the world is, is the mystical." -- Ludwig Wittgenstein