Xref: utzoo news.groups:14493 talk.religion.newage:4879
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!ap1i+
From: ap1i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Andrew C. Plotkin)
Newsgroups: news.groups,talk.religion.newage
Subject: Re: Moderation (was Re: Discussion: talk.religion.pagan)
Message-ID: <cZM5cUi00V41880VJ4@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 14 Nov 89 18:32:00 GMT
References: <1042@umigw.MIAMI.EDU>,
	<9608@goofy.megatest.UUCP>
Organization: Class of '92, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 16
In-Reply-To: <9608@goofy.megatest.UUCP>

> Excerpts from netnews.talk.religion.newage: 13-Nov-89 Re: Moderation
> (was Re: Dis.. Dave Jones@megatest.UUCP (1463)

> In article (Andrew C. Plotkin) writes:
> > Even so, creating the group will not keep out the fundies, skeptics,
> > or other posters whose sole purpose seems to be bent on detraction
> > and/or harassment.  Is moderation such a dirty word?

> Great tactic that: Lump together two groups who consider themselves
> [....]


Disclaimer: I didn't write that. (I don't remember who did.) Please
watch your attributions.

--Z