Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!texbell!sugar!ficc!jeffd
From: jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: A proposal for a new voting scheme
Summary: Let's ask!
Message-ID: <6959@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 14 Nov 89 15:17:47 GMT
References: <6931@ficc.uu.net> <1989Nov12.162221.10189@NCoast.ORG> <22222@gryphon.COM>
Organization: Ferranti International Controls
Lines: 36

Richard Sexton writes:
> >
> >most people voted FOR sci.aquaria on the merits of the 
> >"aquaria", not the "sci"
> 
> This is your opinion, which is a good thing, because if you had stated that
> as a fact, I would have been duty bound to point out that you are wrong.



... and I will feel duty bound to point out that YOU are wrong.  But let's
ask those who voted on sci.aquaria:



If you voted yes, please send me your response to this question:

 I voted YES to get an aquaria group, regardless of name.  ___
 I would have voted NO to rec.aquaria.                     ___


And if you voted no, please send me your response to this question:

 I voted NO because of the name.               ___
 I would have voted NO to any aquaria group.   ___


Thanks.

Jeff


-- 
           "'Tis not too late to seek a newer world."

                           -- Alfred, Lord Tennyson