Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!usc!samsung!uunet!ateng!chip From: chip@ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Call For Discussion: Changing the Voting Guidelines Message-ID: <25607817.439@ateng.com> Date: 14 Nov 89 20:39:49 GMT References: <8566@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <255854A7.21623@ateng.com> <1989Nov8.193100.13782@eng.umd.edu> <2559AC55.5660@ateng.com> <1989Nov9.224235.20472@eng.umd.edu> Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL Lines: 18 According to russotto@eng.umd.edu (Matthew T. Russotto): >In article <2559AC55.5660@ateng.com> chip@ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg) writes: >>No matter what the rules, if I think something's wrong with a group, >>I vote NO; if not, I don't. > >Maybe you. But what about the net.minimalists (No More Newsgroups). >100 of them and no more groups are created. Period. You must have me confused with somebody else. I don't support the "100 NO means NO" proposal. My proposal is Chuq's: One hundred more yeas than nays, and, Yeas must outnumber nays two to one. -- You may redistribute this article only to those who may freely do likewise. Chip Salzenberg at A T Engineering; or