Path: utzoo!attcan!sobmips!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ark1!ark1!dsill
From: dsill@ark1.nswc.navy.mil (Dave Sill)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Give it up, folks (REALLY: THE SOLUTION)
Message-ID: <1989Nov16.141520.8860@relay.nswc.navy.mil>
Date: 16 Nov 89 14:15:20 GMT
References: <1989Nov15.231248.11580@world.std.com> <36339@apple.Apple.COM> <10119@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu> <36343@apple.Apple.COM> <1989Nov11.002535.21243@world.std.com> <255F14A9.16035@ateng.com> <1989Nov15.160912.8148@world.std.com>
Sender: news@relay.nswc.navy.mil (News)
Reply-To: Dave Sill <dsill@relay.nswc.navy.mil>
Organization: Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren VA
Lines: 13

In article <1989Nov15.231248.11580@world.std.com>, bzs@world.std.com
(Barry Shein) writes:
> 
> Why not something like a termcap file for groups?

I think that's an excellent idea, but it doesn't solve all our
problems.

For example, take the sci.aquaria debate.  (Oh no, not *that*.)  How
will the newsgroupcap alleviate the "right group, wrong hierarchy"
problem?

Dave Sill (dsill@relay.nswc.navy.mil)