Path: utzoo!attcan!sobmips!uunet!ateng!chip
From: chip@ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: A Few Observations
Message-ID: <2562D3D9.16489@ateng.com>
Date: 16 Nov 89 15:35:52 GMT
References: <1989Nov10.045531.4549@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu> <36393@apple.Apple.COM> <1626@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL
Lines: 12

According to davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr):
>Would you really want a group to pass, say, 7-2 because it got a 2/3
>majority?  The 100 vote requirement keeps us from getting groups with
>no readership.

Of course.  The 100 vote requirement should not be weakened.  Chuq's
proposal (with which I agree) is to add an _additional_ 2/3 majority
requirement on top of the 100 vote differential requirement.
-- 
You may redistribute this article only to those who may freely do likewise.
Chip Salzenberg at A T Engineering;  <chip@ateng.com> or <uunet!ateng!chip>
    "Did I ever tell you the Jim Gladding story about the binoculars?"