Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!pcr1_ltd From: pcr1_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Pablo) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Suspicious Results of sci.aquaria vote Message-ID: <4124@ur-cc.UUCP> Date: 18 Nov 89 00:48:30 GMT References: <21910@gryphon.COM> <4323@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM> <18175.25612d86@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <4199@nigel.udel.EDU> <3975@sbcs.sunysb.edu> Reply-To: pcr1_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Pablo) Followup-To: news.groups Distribution: usa Organization: The Lab Lines: 21 In article <3975@sbcs.sunysb.edu> brnstnd@stealth.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes: >In article <4199@nigel.udel.EDU>, berryh@udel.edu (John Berryhill) writes: >> There are quite a few grad students at UDEL that keep >> aquaria and I let them know that a newsgroup was being formed for that >> purpose. What on God's green earth is "dishonest" about it? > >Nothing, if you told them about both rec.aquaria and sci.aquaria. Did you? >---Dan You see, John, what you did _was_ wrong, because even though _you_ thought that the vote was on whether sci.aquaria should exist or not, the vote was in fact _between_ sci.aquaria and rec.aquaria! Feeling ashamed yet? Okay, it was an honest mistake. Just don't do it again. Bernstein, you wouldn't know honesty if it stuck its cold, hard fingers up your nostrils and tongue-kissed you. Pablo "News.groups? You mean this isn't talk.righteous.indignation.idiots? Sorry."