Path: utzoo!yunexus!ists!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!allbery From: allbery@NCoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: misc.headlines.unitex moderator RESIGNS Message-ID: <1989Nov18.183042.2482@NCoast.ORG> Date: 18 Nov 89 18:30:42 GMT Article-I.D.: NCoast.1989Nov18.183042.2482 References: <1081@umigw.MIAMI.EDU> Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery) Followup-To: news.groups Organization: North Coast Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, OH Lines: 25 To make a constructive suggestion about m.h.unitex (what, a *constructive* comment in news.groups? Isn't that against the Canons or something? ;-) -- May I suggest that someone not directly related to UNITEX (and hence not as suscepible to pressure as someone in Patt Haring's position would be) propose a moderated newsgroup for the kinds of UNITEX messages that were intended for misc.headlines.unitex? As this would not be under the aegis of UNITEX, it would be easy (or easier, at least) to reject fund-raising and other unsuitable messages. (For those who want to flame this, let me remind you that the NSFnet *does* have rules, and I wouldn't be too surprised to find that UNITEX's version of m.h.unitex would violate them. Better to squelch one newsgroup than lose the use of NSFnet for any newsgroup because we won't follow the rules.) The resulting newsgroup would provide the kind of message traffic that the voters for m.h.unitex wanted when they voted for the newsgroup. ++Brandon (just making a suggestion, I will not participate in such a newsgroup) -- Brandon S. Allbery allbery@NCoast.ORG, BALLBERY (MCI Mail), ALLBERY (Delphi) uunet!hal.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery ncoast!allbery@hal.cwru.edu bsa@telotech.uucp *(comp.sources.misc mail to comp-sources-misc[-request]@backbone.site, please)* *Third party vote-collection service: send mail to allbery@uunet.uu.net (ONLY)* expnet.all: Experiments in *net management and organization. Mail me for info.