Path: utzoo!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!coolidge From: coolidge@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu (John Coolidge) Newsgroups: news.software.b Subject: Re: Anyone interested in end-to-end checksums in news? Summary: RFC's, error reporting Message-ID: <1989Nov17.001724.16164@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu> Date: 17 Nov 89 00:17:24 GMT References: <14594@well.UUCP> <14922@bfmny0.UU.NET> <1989Nov16.173546.6101@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu> <14923@bfmny0.UU.NET> Sender: news@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu Reply-To: coolidge@cs.uiuc.edu Organization: U of Illinois, CS Dept., Systems Research Group Lines: 31 tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff) writes: >Exempting specific header fields (Path, Xref) from checksumming is an >acceptable alternative to checksumming just the body, provided you don't >mind enthroning a specific set of headers in the RFC (this proposal >needs one, by the way). What really needs to be done is to integrate the Checksum: feature and all of the bugs in the RFC's that have come to light in this group over the last few months and make up an all-new Standards for Transmission of Usenet News RFC. Limit specifically the ability of header-mungers to work their evil voodoo, fix implementation-specific RFC bogosities, that sort of thing. >It seems worthwhile to log corrupted articles carefully including path >information, so that suspect links can be investigated. The info could >be collected periodically a la Arbitron and collated centrally for >announcement on a new cable TV show, "Usenet's Most Wanted" :-) Yup, this sounds like the right thing to do. Shunt the damaged article off to the side, report the problem, and make sure it doesn't go past your site. --John -------------------------------------------------------------------------- John L. Coolidge Internet:coolidge@cs.uiuc.edu UUCP:uiucdcs!coolidge Of course I don't speak for the U of I (or anyone else except myself) Copyright 1989 John L. Coolidge. Copying allowed if (and only if) attributed. You may redistribute this article if and only if your recipients may as well. New NNTP connections always available! Send mail if you're interested.