Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!usc!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcuhb!hpindda!mears
From: mears@hpindda.HP.COM (David Mears)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: Shuttle on Mission:  Impossible
Message-ID: <3330024@hpindda.HP.COM>
Date: 11 Nov 89 00:29:35 GMT
References: <3330023@hpindda.HP.COM>
Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 18

Well, it wasn't great, but it wasn't bad either.  I noticed a few
inconsistancies; people who follow things much closer than I probably
noticed a few more.  There were some external shots with a white
external tank and some with the more recent orange.  There were also
shots that implied that there was a metal surface around the cabin
windows rather than tiles.  However, there was also a lot of good NASA
footage and the special effects for weightlessness were fairly decent.
At least they didn't just ignore gravity altogether.  Considering that
they didn't have a major motion picture budget, I think they did quite
well.

Anybody else see it?  Like it?  Hate it?  Other comments?

David B. Mears
Hewlett-Packard
Cupertino CA
hplabs!hpda!mears
mears@hpda.HP.COM