Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucdavis!csusac!sactoh0!mahaun
From: mahaun@sactoh0.UUCP (Mark A. Haun)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: Shuttle on Mission:  Impossible
Summary: just one other *small* inconsistency...
Message-ID: <2078@sactoh0.UUCP>
Date: 12 Nov 89 19:47:26 GMT
References: <3330023@hpindda.HP.COM> <3330024@hpindda.HP.COM>
Organization: Sacramento Public Access, Ca. USA
Lines: 17

In article <3330024@hpindda.HP.COM>, mears@hpindda.HP.COM (David Mears) writes:
> Anybody else see it?  Like it?  Hate it?  Other comments?

There was just one other minor problem in the plot;  they had the
laser destroying communications satellites which would obviously be
in geostationary orbit!  I liked that one shot of the shuttle 
approaching what looked to me like an Intelsat-series sat....

Other than that, and about 100 other gross inconsistencies, it
wasn't all that bad :-) ...


-- 
(     Mark A. Haun  KJ6PC     )(    UUCP: ...ames!pacbell!sactoh0!mahaun     )
(   Sac-Unix, Sacramento CA   )( AMPRNET: kj6pc@kj6pc.ampr.org               )
( IP: [44.2.0.56]  144.93 Mhz )(  PACKET: kj6pc@wa6nwe.#nocal.ca.usa.na      )
(             INTERNET: mmsac!sactoh0!mahaun@sacto.West.Sun.COM              )