Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!uunet!genbank!apple!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!cadre.dsl.pitt.edu!geb
From: geb@cadre.dsl.pitt.edu (Gordon E. Banks)
Newsgroups: bionet.agroforestry
Subject: Re: (none)
Message-ID: <1989Nov20.154125.8632@cadre.dsl.pitt.edu>
Date: 20 Nov 89 15:41:25 GMT
References: <8911200203.AA25538@net.bio.net>
Reply-To: geb@cadre.dsl.pitt.edu (Gordon E. Banks)
Organization: Decision Systems Laboratory, Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA.
Lines: 7

In article <8911200203.AA25538@net.bio.net> PLS6DTC@cms1.ucs.leeds.ac.uk writes:
>
> This is to introduce the Leeds University agroforestry project.
>
Why is this approach better than growing trees on one plot and
bushes on another?  Is it aesthetic, or does the mixture add
something to the environment that makes it more productive?