Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tank!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jato!mars!kaleb
From: kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: RISC vs CISC
Message-ID: <2220@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Date: 17 Nov 89 23:41:59 GMT
References: <29806@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Sender: news@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov
Reply-To: kaleb@mars.UUCP (Kaleb Keithley)
Distribution: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
Lines: 17

In article <28384@necntc.nec.com> pec@necntc.UUCP (Paul Cohen) writes:
>The formal part number for the V33 is uPD70136, available in three
>different packages, in both 12.5 and 16MHz versions. The 16 MHz part
>is approximately four times as fast as the 10 MHz V30 with which it is
>upward compatible (the V30 is 5% to 10% faster than an 8086 at the same
>clock frequency).  It supports a 16 MByte address space through an
>internal address translation mechanism (which directly supports LIM 4.0).
>A floating point co-processor, the uPD72291, is available which performs
>at 500 KFlop's.

I've seen the V53, which I have some passing interest in, however, I'm more
interested in a V23.  Any chance that they made such a thing?

Benson, you are so mercifully devoid of the ravages of intelligence.

kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov             (818)354-8771
Kaleb Keithley