Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!cca.ucsf.edu!wet!logic
From: logic@wet.UUCP (Henry Kwan)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: USR adding V.42
Message-ID: <789@wet.UUCP>
Date: 21 Nov 89 03:02:04 GMT
References: <[255f7779:71]comp.dcom.modems@nstar.UUCP> <5830004@hpccc.HP.COM>
Reply-To: logic@wet.UUCP (Henry Kwan)
Organization: Wetware Diversions, San Francisco
Lines: 22

In article <5830004@hpccc.HP.COM> bourman@hpccc.HP.COM (BobbHewlett-PackardCorpNetEngPaloAltoCa.) writes:
>
> Is thei V.42 or V.42bis ????   V.42 is being replaced with V.42bis and I 
> wouldn't waste my time on just V.42 error correction.
>
>
> BOBB

According to the InfoWorld article, USR is upgrading the HSTs to v.42bis.
The article goes on to state that v.42bis is suppose to perform up to 30%
better than v.42.  Which still doesn't tell us if having compression on
while transmitting LZHed/ZIPed files will do us any good.  Oh well.

I am having trouble connecting in v.32 with a USR Dual Standard to a Telebit
T2500.  Does anyone know which S-register might be fiddled with to provide
better results?

-- 
Henry Kwan                |  AppleLink: D0690
FWB, Inc.                 |  CompuServe: 71320,1034
2040 Polk St.  Ste 215    |  Internet: claris!wet!logic@ames.arc.nasa.gov
San Francisco, CA  94109  |  UUCP: {claris,hoptoad,lamc,ucsfcca}!wet!logic