Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: peter%ficc@uunet.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Caller-ID and Blocking Message-ID: Date: 17 Nov 89 15:29:06 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Lines: 13 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 520, message 6 of 12 Well, no. I wouldn't anticipate using the anonymity very often. But then I'm not one of those folks who have a fit when a telemarketer calls them. And I'm not into telephone harassment. And like I said, you can always ignore calls with no ID. (though a while ago I was getting harassed by someone, and when I called them back I got their boss, who wanted to know why I was harassing his employees!) `-_-' Peter da Silva . 'U` -------------- +1 713 274 5180. "vi is bad because it didn't work after I put jelly in my keyboard." -- Jeffrey W Percival (jwp@larry.sal.wisc.edu)