Xref: utzoo comp.edu:2687 comp.software-eng:2457
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!xanth!mcnc!duke!romeo!crm
From: crm@romeo.cs.duke.edu (Charlie Martin)
Newsgroups: comp.edu,comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: CS education
Message-ID: <16114@duke.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 16 Nov 89 18:05:44 GMT
Sender: news@duke.cs.duke.edu
Reply-To: crm@romeo.UUCP (Charlie Martin)
Organization: Duke University CS Dept.; Durham, NC
Lines: 11

In article <7057@hubcap.clemson.edu	 hutch%citron.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu writes:
	
	Can it still be true that most people actually believe in
	the waterfall model of the life cycle?

Unfortunately, yes,  Get a look at DoD 2167A or most SE texts.

There are a lot of people (some who have reviewed papers of mine) who
belive that the waterfall model IS the life cycle.  Not the description,
the thing in itself.
Charlie Martin (crm@cs.duke.edu,mcnc!duke!crm)