Xref: utzoo comp.lang.ada:2974 comp.lang.c++:5625
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu
From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: interesting statistic
Message-ID: <7172@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Date: 22 Nov 89 18:54:01 GMT
References: <1989Nov19.072556.14606@ico.isc.com>
Sender: news@hubcap.clemson.edu
Reply-To: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu
Lines: 10

From rcd@ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn):
> I guess we can conclude that NTT maintained a commitment to Ada in spite of
> a five-year lack of production-quality compilers???

    Conclusion correct... they were apparently doing MIS applications 
    in which the quality of the object code was not very important.


    Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu