Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!xanth!mcnc!ncsuvx!ecemwl!jnh
From: jnh@ecemwl.ncsu.edu (Joseph N. Hall)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Do class libraries have to be in source form? (1 of 4)
Keywords: libraries, source, C++
Message-ID: <4612@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu>
Date: 21 Nov 89 17:46:49 GMT
References: <176@taumet.UUCP> <29023@genrad.UUCP>
Sender: news@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu
Reply-To: jnh@ecemwl.UUCP (Joseph N. Hall)
Organization: North Carolina State University
Lines: 10

In article <29023@genrad.UUCP> dxb@genrad.UUCP (Daniel A. Burkhard) writes:
>.. I have yet to see documentation that fully replaces source!

That's because source IS documentation!  I will freely cast my aspersions
on any assertions that it should not be the BEST documentation.

v   v sssss|| joseph hall                      || 4116 Brewster Drive
 v v s   s || jnh@ecemwl.ncsu.edu (Internet)   || Raleigh, NC  27606
  v   sss  || SP Software/CAD Tool Developer, Mac Hacker and Keyboardist
-----------|| Disclaimer: NCSU may not share my views, but is welcome to.