Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!oliveb!tymix!cirrusl!dhesi%cirrusl
From: dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: (* func)(fred, bert)
Message-ID: <1113@cirrusl.UUCP>
Date: 22 Nov 89 01:32:23 GMT
References: <2387@stl.stc.co.uk> <744@lakart.UUCP> <0175@sheol.UUCP> <812@bbm.UUCP> <11592@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Sender: news@cirrusl.UUCP
Reply-To: dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: Cirrus Logic Inc.
Lines: 11

In article <11592@smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>However, your code is not
>portable.

The great portable-as-boolean fallacy again.

His code is less than 100.000% portable, but it is probably more than
99.999% portable.

Rahul Dhesi <dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com>
UUCP:  oliveb!cirrusl!dhesi