Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!ucsd!sdcc6!ir230 From: ir230@sdcc6.ucsd.edu (john wavrik) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: porting an MS-DOS Forth to a 386 Unix/Xenix Summary: comp.lang.forth -- a realistic view Keywords: MS-DOS, Forth, porting, source, help Message-ID: <5317@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> Date: 22 Nov 89 18:37:57 GMT References: <1989Nov20.211822.1015@tree.uucp> Organization: University of California, San Diego Lines: 32 stever@tree.uucp (Steve Rudek) writes: > I said all that and I got . . . silence. Doesn't anyone knowledgeable who > reads this group share my interest in getting F83 or F-PC or some other > good Forth to run on a 386 Unix?? Did my message fail to get widely > distributed to the net? Did I say something so "silly" or boring in my > posting that everyone immediately pressed "n"? Maybe none of the serious Forth > people who follow this group work on 386 Unix machines? I suppose you might > be divided between those who read usenet but only work on MS-DOS and those > who do use Unix but have high end Sun workstations and VAX minicomputers?? People rarely post a message to the net saying "I don't know the answer to the question asked by Steve Rudek" Somehow when we post to this newsgroup we believe that we are addressing the entire Forth community. Periodically I post a call for people who are involved in teaching Forth and are interested in education -- and I get silence too. There are people involved in teaching Forth, they just aren't on USENET. [Actually there are only about 10 people on comp.lang.forth (even this is a bit misleading since Tom Almy, Bill Bouma, Mitch Bradley, and John Wavrik are really pseudonyms for one person who periodically writes a series of heated exchanges to stir things up)] P.S. I know of at least one person who responded to you by email. John J Wavrik jjwavrik@ucsd.edu Dept of Math C-012 Univ of Calif - San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093