Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!usc!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!att!pacbell!dsinc!cdin-1!ki4pv!cdis-1!tanner
From: tanner@cdis-1.uucp (Dr. T. Andrews)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Elm 2.2 PL10
Summary: reference desired
Keywords: All mail is lost if /usr/spool is full !
Message-ID: <7739@cdis-1.uucp>
Date: 17 Nov 89 22:19:47 GMT
References: <91266@pyramid.pyramid.com> <1989Nov16.145450.14312@DSI.COM>
Organization: CDI-DLD
Lines: 9

In article <1989Nov16.145450.14312@DSI.COM>, syd@DSI.COM (Syd Weinstein) writes:
) EB26 When using an address of the form "node!user@domain", the !
)      has higher precedence than the @ when elm resolves the ad-
)      dress.  The @ should have higher precedence.
Actually, mixed @/! addresses are frowned upon.  Each mailer is free
to mis-handle them in the most convenient manner.
-- 
Mulroney: "Cut trains.  Drive in | {bpa,uunet}!cdin-1!cdis-1!tanner
Canada.  We need the acid rain." | {attctc gatech!uflorida}!ki4pv!cdis-1!tanner