Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!rutgers!ucsd!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!msir
From: msir@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mark Sirota)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: at -> @, HSubject:
Message-ID: <4096@ur-cc.UUCP>
Date: 16 Nov 89 22:34:08 GMT
References: <4105@phri.UUCP> <1989Nov11.171244.28119@acheron.uucp> <3244@3comvax.SPD.3Com.Com>
Reply-To: Mark Sirota <msir@cc.rochester.edu>
Organization: Univ. of Rochester, Computing Center
Lines: 10

Do we have a consensus that the "at" -> "@" translation is useless, and that
the HSubject: line is also useless?

I want to be sure about these before I remove them from our sendmail.cf's...
Please reply if you have a strong feeling either way.  Thanks in advance.
-- 
Mark Sirota - University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
 Internet: msir@cc.rochester.edu
 Bitnet:   msir@uordbv.bitnet
 UUCP:     {decvax,harvard,ames,rutgers}!rochester!ur-cc!msir