Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!microsoft!robertre
From: robertre@microsoft.UUCP (Robert Reichel ms2)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2
Subject: Re: signals, threads, and memory allocation
Message-ID: <9099@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 20 Nov 89 21:56:42 GMT
References: <32295@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <8551@microsoft.UUCP> <2602@auspex.auspex.com> <8714@microsoft.UUCP> <2620@auspex.auspex.com> <9006@microsoft.UUCP> <2639@auspex.auspex.com> <9094@microsoft.UUCP>
Reply-To: robertre@microsoft.UUCP (Robert Reichel ms2)
Organization: Microsoft Corp.
Lines: 15

In article <9094@microsoft.UUCP> robertre@microsoft.UUCP (Robert Reichel ms2) writes:
>I don't have a copy of this handy.  I assume it's what came with the
>SDK?  Regardless, you can bang on something with DosFlagProcess all
>you want, but unless it has a handler registered, you're going to
>get an error back.

Ha!  What a hosehead.  The default action for a flag is ignore, so
the sender won't get an error back.  Serves me right for trusting
my memory.

Sorry 'bout that.  Even Mother makes mistakes sometimes...
-- 
My opinions are my own and to not necessarily reflect those of Microsoft
Corporation.
Robert Reichel		 {decvax,uunet,uw-beaver}!microsoft!robertre