Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!saturn!jacob@ntvax.uucp
From: jacob@ntvax.uucp (Tom Jacob)
Newsgroups: comp.os.research
Subject: Re: message-passing vs shared memory
Message-ID: <9824@saturn.ucsc.edu>
Date: 17 Nov 89 02:27:18 GMT
Sender: usenet@saturn.ucsc.edu
Organization: University of North Texas
Lines: 19
Approved: comp-os-research@jupiter.ucsc.edu

In article <9745@saturn.ucsc.edu> mendozag@ee.ecn.purdue.edu (Victor M Mendoza-Grado) writes:
>
> I am trying to recall the reference where the set of primitives
> for message-passing and for shared memory mechanisms are shown
> to be equivalent in power. I that thought maybe someone in the net
> can lend a hand, which I'll appreciate very much.
>  

How about

     H.C. Lauer and R.M. Needham, On the duality of operating system
     structures, reprinted  in Operating Systems Review, vol. 13, no. 2,
     (1979), pp. 3-19

Tom Jacob
Department of Computer Science
University of North Texas

jacob@dept.csci.unt.edu