Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!rutgers!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!ncis.tis.llnl.gov!A.ISI.EDU!CERF
From: CERF@A.ISI.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
Subject: Re: concise format
Message-ID: <[A.ISI.EDU]21-Nov-89.05:24:49.CERF>
Date: 21 Nov 89 10:24:00 GMT
References: <8911201449.AA29591@lotus.com>
Sender: news@ncis.tis.llnl.gov
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 10
Approved: post-x400@tis.llnl.gov

Bob,

I was not proposing a separate field in RFC822 which was
unbound to the "address" - really, I think I was observing
that having both attributes available, as in the X.400 O/R
name was helpful. None of this makes me any more happy with
the current X.400 O/R Name or the X.500 naming syntaxes,
unfortunately.

Vint