Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!sybil.cs.Buffalo.EDU!gbbrooks
From: gbbrooks@sybil.cs.Buffalo.EDU (G. Brandon Brooks)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Goofy, but it helps: 1084 "fuzzy" interlace problem.
Keywords: 1084 MONITOR FUZZY INTERLACE OVERLAPPING INTERLACE SPAM
Message-ID: <13490@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Date: 17 Nov 89 23:56:38 GMT
References: <13271@s.ms.uky.edu>
Sender: nobody@acsu.buffalo.edu
Reply-To: gbbrooks@sybil.cs.Buffalo.EDU.UUCP (G. Brandon Brooks)
Organization: SUNY/Buffalo Computer Science
Lines: 22

In article <13271@s.ms.uky.edu> phoenix@ms.uky.edu (R'ykandar Korra'ti) writes:
>
>     My 1084 is one of those which repeatedly shows the "overstriking
>interlace" problem, wherein the second set of interlace lines sometimes
>decides that it would like to sit on top of the first set. The 2002 does
>this as well, but there's a fix for it from Commodore.
>     Anyway, a some weeks ago I decided to stop tilting my monitor via
>its built-in front-end "foot" and let it just sit on top of its flat stand.
>     The overstriking interlace problem decreased immediately and signifi-
>cantly. I didn't want to post anything until I had given it time to become

	I have the SAME exact problem with my 1084 monitor, but I leave it
flat all the time. I don't think the problem results from the stand.
	My incredibly non-technical theory about why MY monitor doesn't
behave is that when I use interlace mode constantly whenever I turn on the
computer, the monitor will behave. But once I go and play a game, or
otherwise use the x200 mode, then when I come back the 1084 has seem to have
"forgotten" how to use interlace mode.
	But I'm still VERY pleased that I can use the interlace mode on my
1084 monitor, rather than having to buy another monitor just for that
purpose....
			-Brandon!