Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!agate!shelby!lindy!ucscb.UCSC.EDU!lunatic
From: lunatic@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Lunatic)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: 100 Meg Vulcan  (Was: Re: 10 mhz ch
Summary: A consideration
Message-ID: <5880@lindy.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 19 Nov 89 05:24:58 GMT
References: <5838@lindy.Stanford.EDU> <113300159@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Sender: news@lindy.Stanford.EDU (News Service)
Reply-To: lunatic@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Lunatic)
Organization: UCSC Undergrads
Lines: 27


In article <113300159@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> krb20699@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
>
>                        The Vulcans are faster and internal.  It helps
>make up the $100 difference, not to mention the specific support the Vulcan
>gives to Apples, i.e. software, etc. that can't be sent with ye generic
>SCSI drive that has to work on all that's SCSI.
>     
    _
   /-\h, but external drives can be daisy-chained to other SCSI peripherals
as well as partitioned and connected to more than one computer.  Also, one
doesn't need to worry about an external drive not working with an upgrade
because it doesn't fit inside the (possibly) new case.  Now, don't take me
me wrong and think this is an argument aganst internal hard drives.  These
are just considerations one has to make when buying a hard drive.  As a
matter of fact, if an internal drive had been available when I was shopping
for my hard drive, I would have bought it.

>							Ken.
>  						  ken-b@uiuc.edu
-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
  ___________                         ARPA: lunatic@uscsb.UCSC.EDU        /
    ________/                         Internet: lunatic%ucscb@ucscc.edu  /
      ____//           _  ___     _   UUCP: ...!ucscc!ucscb!lunatic     /
     ___///__ {_} |\| /-\  |  ][ {_   GEnie: L.BRUCE  (Lunatic Bruce)  /
    __________________________________________________________________/  (: