Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!rutgers!ucsd!ogccse!blake!ramsiri From: ramsiri@blake.acs.washington.edu (Enartloc Nhoj) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: SeaGate 296n information... Message-ID: <4480@blake.acs.washington.edu> Date: 16 Nov 89 20:50:19 GMT References: <891113.14502027.074992@SFA.CP6> <1341@uvm-gen.UUCP> Reply-To: ramsiri@blake.acs.washington.edu (Enartloc Nhoj) Organization: University of Washington, Seattle Lines: 29 In article <1341@uvm-gen.UUCP> pegram@uvm-gen.UUCP (pegram r) writes: >From article <891113.14502027.074992@SFA.CP6>, > by Z4648252@SFAUSTIN.BITNET (Z4648252): >> >> I know that this has been thrashed royally here before, but could >> someone send me the particulars of the problems with the SeaGate 296n >> REVISION 8, or is it 7? 1:1 interweave chokes, etc... > Stuff deleted... >> Larry Rymal: |East Texas Atari 68NNNers| > >I'm also thinking of getting a 296N, perhaps a synopsis of 296N >problems could be reposted? On the other hand, it might be ROM 8 Does NOT format 1:1 successfully... sure it will run.. if a 57K/sec DTR is satisfactory for you ! The older ROM 7 drives (hard to find these days) will format 1:1 and give you about 550 K/sec. Seagate recognized the problem with ROM 8's and, I believe, successfully rectified it. I vaguely recall reading about a ROM 12? Perhaps someone else can fill in at this point, as i dropped following the Seagate drives when i ran into the ROM 8 problem last February. -kevin ramsiri@blake.acs.washington.edu