Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!rutgers!ucsd!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!lawley From: lawley@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Michael Lawley - ELISPer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.encore Subject: Re: Umax4.3 & NFS (& shared memory size) Message-ID: Date: 17 Nov 89 02:59:39 GMT References: <1536@bnlux0.bnl.gov> <1761@minyos.xx.rmit.oz> Sender: news@cs.mu.oz.au Reply-To: lawley@cs.mu.OZ.AU Distribution: comp Organization: Computer Science Dept., University of Melbourne, Australia. Lines: 26 In-reply-to: rcodi@chudich.co.rmit.oz's message of 17 Nov 89 00:15:48 GMT On 17 Nov 89 00:15:48 GMT, rcodi@chudich.co.rmit.oz (Ian Donaldson) said: > Sender: news@minyos.xx.rmit.oz > Does anybody know if it [Umax 4.3] supports more than 64k of shared memory? > (Umax 4.2 had this limitation and it was the *only* reason we went > to Umax V; regretting it ever since) > Ian D Funny, we did exactly the same thing; regretting it ever since. (Although working from within emacs takes away a lot of the pain of SysV != BSD.) I wonder if this has been a common path for Multimax users? mike -- /-------------------------------------------------------\ | If lawley@cs.mu.OZ.AU doesn't work, try: | | | | ACSnet: lawley@munnari.oz | | UUCP: {uunet,ukc,ubc-cs,mcvax}!munnari!lawley | | ARPA: lawley%munnari.oz.au@uunet.uu.net | \-------------------------------------------------------/