Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!decwrl!shelby!portia!hobbes
From: hobbes@portia.Stanford.EDU (Andrew Zimmerman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: TurboC, wanderer, and Zenith Supersport
Summary: Correction
Message-ID: <6974@portia.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 24 Nov 89 07:12:58 GMT
References: <6973@portia.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: Andrew Zimmerman <hobbes@Portia.stanford.edu>
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 26

In article <6973@portia.Stanford.EDU>, hobbes@portia.Stanford.EDU (Andrew Zimmerman) writes:
> Turbo C:
>     Is there a bug in the >> operator in Turbo C?  The following 
> section of code doesn't seem to work (Turbo C 2.0)
> 
>     long value, shift;
> 
>     value = 0x8000;
>     for(shift=0; shift < 32; shift++)
>     {
> 	printf("%08X\n",value >> shift);
>     }
> Seems to work fine if shift is an int.  (I know, I could do a (int) in front
> of the shift, I just think that it should work without one.)
> 
    Sorry about the above program.  As one individual pointed out to me, I
have the wrong format in the print statement.  It should have been lX,
in which case it works just fine.  (Thats what you get when you use the
scanf formats in a printf statement (X is for a long in scanf, but is for
an int in printf))
 
Andrew
zimmer@calvin.stanford.edu
hobbes@portia.stanford.edu