Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!uci-ics!rfg
From: rfg@ics.uci.edu (Ron Guilmette)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m88k
Subject: Re: Register Allocation (was Re: Info about 88open & standards)
Message-ID: <1989Nov20.205654.11970@paris.ics.uci.edu>
Date: 21 Nov 89 04:56:55 GMT
References: <1948@psueea.UUCP> <1989Nov14.175806.23483@paris.ics.uci.edu> <5063@tekcrl.LABS.TEK.COM> <PFEIFFER.89Nov15213136@puye.nmsu.edu> <2631@yogi.oakhill.UUCP> <1989Nov16.212149.9770@paris.ics.uci.edu> <2647@bushwood.oakhill.UUCP> <31783@winchester.mips.COM>
Reply-To: Ron Guilmette <rfg@ics.uci.edu>
Organization: University of California, Irvine - Dept of ICS
Lines: 17

In article <31783@winchester.mips.COM> mash@mips.COM (John Mashey) writes:
>In article <2647@bushwood.oakhill.UUCP> oakhill!bushwood!phillip@cs.utexas.edu (Mike Phillip) writes:
>>In article <1989Nov16.212149.9770@paris.ics.uci.edu> Ron Guilmette <rfg@ics.uci.edu> writes:
>
>In defense of Mr. Phillip...

I didn't realize that anybody was attacking him!

>both HP PA and MIPS R3000s split the integer
>registers in approximately the same ratio as does the 88K...

Like lemmings to the sea.  Is everyone making the same mistake in the same
way?

Inquiring minds want to know!

// rfg