Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!dptg!ulysses!ucbvax!MACBETH.STANFORD.EDU!B.BSK
From: B.BSK@MACBETH.STANFORD.EDU (Brian Keller)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: re: Borland (was Calc programs)
Message-ID: <12542856940.20.B.BSK@Macbeth.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 17 Nov 89 04:50:59 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 15

In article <5182@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman)
writes:

> I would go further and suggest that any Borland product for the Mac is
> unlikely to be worthwhile.  Certainly Turbo Pascal is not


What's wrong with Turbo Pascal?  I use it for all kinds of programming from
simulations to full Mac style interfaces.  Am I missing something?  I love
the fast compile time and it's pretty good at recovering from fairly serious
crashes through macsbug.  So far it's been compatible with every system
update I've installed.  What's the problem?

Brian Keller
-------