Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!excelan!kinetics.com From: markw@kinetics.com (Mark Wittenberg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: How fast should the EtherTalk board be? Message-ID: <763@excelan.COM> Date: 22 Nov 89 19:35:05 GMT References: <375@capmkt.COM> Sender: news@excelan.COM Lines: 31 From article <375@capmkt.COM>, by bandy@capmkt.COM (Shift Happens): > neil@yc.estec.nl (Neil Dixon) writes that his Macintosh EtherTalk interface > card in his Mac II is only giving him 4kb/sec transsfer rates with NCSA > Telnet. He wonders if this is normal. > > Unfortunately, it's quite normal. In addition to your Macintosh being > somewhat slow [no DMA], the EtherTalk card [as of last May, which is the > last time I complained to anyone at Apple about it] doesn't support on-board > buffering, even though they have 16kbytes worth of packet buffers. Perhaps normal, but not (to me) acceptable. Our (Novell/Excelan/Kinetics) telnet/ftp program (LAN Workplace for the Mac) running over our Ethernet board (EtherPort II) in binary mode gets 50KB to 95KB per second (bytes, not bits) on a MacII with a fast disk; you should see at least 15KB to 25KB on any platform. I'd like to claim that our board is just that much faster than Apple's, but I don't think that it's true (we don't have DMA either ...). I think that it's your NCSA Telnet; that's about the throughput I got when I first tested it. To get better throughput: 1. Get the latest version. 2. (Even if you don't get the latest version) Tune the settable parameters in your config file; in particular, set the buffer sizes bigger (try 4K). 3. Consider buying a supported commercial product. I know that both ours and Intercon's (the commercial version of NCSA) are good; there are probably others too (Ungermann-Bass?) Mark Wittenberg Voice: (415) 975-4512 Kinetics/Excelan/Novell, Inc. Internet: markw@kinetics.com 1340 Treat Blvd. Suite 500 UUCP: ucbvax!mtxinu!kinetics!markw Walnut Creek, CA 94596 AppleLink: D0927